Understanding the unnaturally small size of the cosmological constant poses one of severest challenges for a theory of gravity. At late times and for large distances, the apparent size of the cosmological constant is constrained to be extremely small in terms of the natural scale for gravity, the Planck mass. In contrast, no observations bound the value of the cosmological constant during the earliest stages of the universe, when corrections to the Einstein-Hilbert action were non-negligible, and its presence can lead to a richer family

of metrics. Among the solutions for a more general gravitational action, the presence of a positive cosmological constant does not inevitably lead to a de Sitter expansion. Such solutions must still yield or evolve into a low energy theory in which the effective cosmological constant is small to be phenomenologically acceptable. If the characteristic scales on which these metrics vary are of extremely high energy or short distance, then it may be possible to integrate out such features to arrive at a slowly varying e®ective theory.

To determine whether an action for gravity, generalized beyond an Einstein-Hilbert term, admits these features | natural coefficients for the terms in the action and a rapid variation | we must ¯rst solve the highly non-linear field equations. This task is difficult even when only the next curvature corrections are added. In 3 + 1 dimensions, Horowitzand Wald and later Starobinsky [3] discovered oscillating solutions for actions that

included quadratic curvature terms but no cosmological constant. Numerical solutions were found in 4 + 1 dimensions in the presence of a cosmological constant and a scalar field, along with the quadratic curvature terms. In this latter scenario, metrics exist that depend periodically on the extra spatial coordinate so that choosing the size of the extra dimension to be the period produces a compact extra dimension without any fine-tunings or singularities. The parameters in the action ¯x the size of the extra dimension uniquely.

However, without an analytical approach it becomes di±cult to generalize these solutions to include an evolution in time. Without this freedom, it is di±cult to understand how a universe starting from a more general state can find itself in one of these configurations.

Home » Interesting Questions » Importance of Cosmological Constant

### AskPhysics Videos

### Archives

### Tags

acceleration
Ans
answer
ask
ask Physics
Auto
body
Business
direction
distance
doubt
Draft
earth
Education
electricity
electron
energy
field
force
gravitation
gravity
kinematics
light
mass
motion
numerical
Online
particle
physics
problem
project
question
relativity
solved
solved paper
solved problems
solved questions
speed
surface
time
United States
velocity
Water
weight
work

# Importance of Cosmological Constant

### Hits so far @ AskPhysics

- 2,202,657 hits

### CBSE Exam Count Down

**AISSCE / AISSE 2020**February 26, 2020

Board Exams for the core subjects of CBSE may start from 26 February (Class X) and 27 February (Class XII)

### Search your query before you ask

### AskPhysics Q&A

- Answered: which theory state that every molecule of magnetic substance is a tiny magnet
- Answered: Why machine get jammed in winter?
- Answered: what is a laser?
- What do you mean by reversible and irreversible process
- Why do we Study electric field along axial line?
- How Quantum Field Theory explains triboelectricity?
- Important topics to study for NEET Physics
- What are the most important topics in JAM Physics?
- If the size of the unit decreases by 20% the% change in the numerical value is
- Why is easier to hammer a sharp nail into wood than a blunt one?

### Featured Posts

M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

« Feb | ||||||

1 | ||||||

2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |

9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |

16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |

23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |

30 | 31 |

You must log in to post a comment.