Home » Ask Physics » Explanation For Empirical Horopter: Density Of Photoreceptors

Subscribe to this site by email

Loading

Explanation For Empirical Horopter: Density Of Photoreceptors

Karolis  asks: ” External SiteLink -In this website (and in many more) in page 5, it’s written that photoreceptors are more densely packed in nasal areas of retina than temporal. That’s one of the explanations why empirical horopter (that’s the unit of all points in visual field, that are seen in the same position monocularly) deviates from theoretical. In page 6, in graphs we see that the same segment in visual field has longer arc in nasal retina than temporal (binocular vision). I don’t see how these two things agree: density of photoreceptors in nasal and temporal retinas and the magnitude of arcs. If compensation would be the case, then I think it should be the reverse situation. Given there are less amount of photoreceptors in temporal area, arc should be longer than that of nasal – so that the quantity of photoreceptors in both areas would be the same.
What’s wrong with my thinking?”

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Hits so far @ AskPhysics

  • 2,249,425 hits

Subscribe to AskPhysics via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,338 other subscribers

November 2020
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Schrodinger’s Cat in Daily Life

%d bloggers like this: