Home » Ask Physics » Explanation For Empirical Horopter: Density Of Photoreceptors

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,066 other subscribers

Archives

Explanation For Empirical Horopter: Density Of Photoreceptors

Share with:


Karolis  asks: ” External SiteLink -In this website (and in many more) in page 5, it’s written that photoreceptors are more densely packed in nasal areas of retina than temporal. That’s one of the explanations why empirical horopter (that’s the unit of all points in visual field, that are seen in the same position monocularly) deviates from theoretical. In page 6, in graphs we see that the same segment in visual field has longer arc in nasal retina than temporal (binocular vision). I don’t see how these two things agree: density of photoreceptors in nasal and temporal retinas and the magnitude of arcs. If compensation would be the case, then I think it should be the reverse situation. Given there are less amount of photoreceptors in temporal area, arc should be longer than that of nasal – so that the quantity of photoreceptors in both areas would be the same.
What’s wrong with my thinking?”

Ask a Doubt

Post your Physics Doubts here

Name (required)

Email (required)

Subject

Message/Doubt/Question

Upload a file if required

askphysics@Twitter

Half Yearly Exam Count Down

Half Yearly Exam Count Down KVS Ernakulam RegionOctober 17th, 2017
The Half Yearly Examination for Kendriya Vidyalayas of Kerala starts from 17 October 2017
%d bloggers like this: