Home » 2015 » November » 26

Daily Archives: November 26, 2015

Subscribe to this site by email

Loading

Remembering Verghese Kurien “Father of White Revolution in India”

Today 26 November 2015 is the 94th birthday of Verghese Kurien popularly known as “Father of White Revolution in India”. He founded around 30 institutions of excellence (like AMUL, GCMMF, IRMA, NDDB) which are owned, managed by farmers and run by professionals. As the founding chairman of the Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation (GCMMF), Kurien was responsible for the creation and success of the Amul brand of dairy products.

Google celebrated the 94th birthday of Verghese Kurien by this doodle

verghese-kuriens-94th-birthday-4760371399229440-hp

Get more details here

mechanical propertices in solids

Why the force of repulsion responsible for formation of solids and not the force of attraction ?

Asked Mayuri

 

Dear Mayuri,

the question is not clear. Please explain further

YDSE (Young’s Double Slit Experiment)

In the question we have a simple YDSE setup , there’s just the addition of a glass slab of thickness t and ,refractive index u, in front of the top slit ( S1). Now we submerge the entire setup into water (given refractive index u1). We now have to find the locations of the points, which are the points of constructive interference( max intensity).

I considered 3 approaches, first-

I calculated the optical path difference in water = t(u/u1 -1)- yd/D. where y is the reference coordinate of the maxima( any general position) from the original central maxima, d is the slit separation , and D is the distance from screen. For constructive interference path difference = n*wavelength( in water). Now wavelength in water= “wavelength in air”/u1 Therefore we get our answer.

Approach two:

I found out the path difference in water and multiplied it by u1 , to get the path difference in air , and I got the same result when I equated this path difference to- n*wavelength(in air).

Approach three- I found the path difference in air – t(u-1)-yd/D and divided this by u1, to get path difference in water, and equated this to n* wavelength (water). This time around , I did not get the answer.

Can anyone explain the difference between the second and third approaches. And also please do tell me, if I have committed some error.

Posted by Garvit Sharma

Hits so far @ AskPhysics

  • 2,249,407 hits

Subscribe to AskPhysics via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,338 other subscribers

November 2015
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

Schrodinger’s Cat in Daily Life

%d bloggers like this: